Was Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Ji only about a community? or Was He the Nation’s First Constitutional Strategist?
- Raj Saraf
- Apr 14
- 2 min read
Why do some people try so hard to limit Dr. B.R. Ambedkar to a slogan?Why is he remembered only as the icon of a single community — when in reality, he shaped the destiny of an entire nation?
And more importantly:Why are we being sold a narrative today that Ambedkar would have “aligned” with every community that had grievances against Hindu society — when his own writings show something far more complex, far more nationalistic, and far more strategic?
These questions are not meant to provoke.They’re meant to awaken.Awaken the youth, the thinking citizen, the law-abiding voter, and the constitutional patriot.
Ambedkar: The Nation’s Architect, Not Just a Dalit Leader
It is both unfortunate and politically convenient that many today try to restrict Ambedkar’s legacy to the phrase Jai Bhim.But let’s remind ourselves:
He was India’s first Law Minister.
He was the chief architect of our Constitution.
He was a scholar of economics, a barrister, a social reformer.
And above all, he was a nationalist — a man who believed in India’s unity, sovereignty, and future.
Misusing Ambedkar for Votes: A Political Crime
Every year, Ambedkar’s image is garlanded. His slogans are raised.But his warnings — especially about Pakistan, separatism, and religious appeasement — are conveniently forgotten.
He wrote clearly about the dangers of religious politics.He warned against creating a Pakistan.He spoke firmly about keeping religion out of governance.And yet today, those who ignored his wisdom use his name for vote-bank politics.
Isn’t that the biggest insult to his intellect?
The False Alliance: Jai Bhim & Religious Radicalism?
A new narrative is being quietly pushed — that Ambedkar would have supported every anti-Hindu alliance simply because he opposed casteism.But that's lazy and misleading.
He never surrendered his nationalism.He never advocated breaking India apart.He warned about Islamic fundamentalism.He was clear that partition was not just political — it was civilizational.
So, ask yourself:Would Ambedkar, a man who fiercely opposed the Muslim League, align with radical elements today?
Hinduism, Reform, and the Real Truth
Ambedkar rejected casteism, yes.He criticized aspects of Hindu orthodoxy, yes.But he also acknowledged the richness of Indian philosophy, the logic of reform, and the potential of unity.
He didn’t hate Hinduism.He hated untouchability — and fought to correct it through law, not through revenge.He worked within the system to change the system.
A Message for Today
Ambedkar’s vision was not about division, but reconstruction.He wanted a strong India — united, equal, and constitutional.He believed in education, self-respect, and justice — not chaos, not street mobs, not vote-bank politics.
So today, on his birth anniversary, let’s not reduce him to a statue or a slogan.
Let’s read his words.Let’s understand his fears.Let’s honor his strategy.And most importantly — let’s protect the India he helped shape.
Comments